Abstract
Objective: Following brain injury, clinical assessments of residual and emerging cognitive function are difficult and fraught with errors. In adults, recent AAN practice guidelines recommend objective neuroimaging and neurophysiological measures to support diagnosis. Equivalent measures are lacking in pediatrics—an especially great challenge due to the combined heterogeneity of both brain injury and pediatric development. Therefore, we aim to establish quantitative, clinically practicable measures of cognitive function following pediatric brain injury.
Methods: Participants with and without brain injury were aged 8–18, clinically classified according to cognitive recovery state: N=8 in disorders of consciousness (DoC), N=7 in confusional state (CS); N=19 cognitively impaired (CI); N=13 typically-developing (TD) uninjured controls. We prospectively measured electroencephalographic markers of sensory processing and attention in an auditory “oddball'' paradigm, and of covert movement attempts in a command-following paradigm.
Results: In three DoC participants, EEG markers of active attempted command-following revealed cognitive function that clinical assessment had failed to detect. These same three individuals could also be distinguished from the rest of their group by two event-related potentials (ERPs) that correlate with sensory processing and orienting attention in the oddball paradigm. Considered across the whole subject group, magnitudes of these two ERP markers significantly increased as cognitive recovery progressed (ANOVA: each p<0.001); viewed jointly, the two ERP markers cleanly delineated the four cognitive states.
Conclusion: Despite heterogeneity of brain injuries and brain development, our objective EEG markers reflected cognitive recovery independent of motor function. Two of these markers required no active participation. Together, they allowed us to identify, for the first time in pediatrics, three individuals who meet the criteria for cognitive motor dissociation. To diagnose, prognose and track cognitive recovery accurately, such markers should be employed in pediatrics.
- Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
