Discontinuation and comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in 2 centers
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Background Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and fingolimod (FTY) are approved oral disease-modifying therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Observational studies are valuable when randomized clinical trials cannot be done due to ethical or practical reasons. Two-site studies allow investigators to further ascertain external validity of previously examined treatment effect differences. Limited head-to-head 2-site studies exist comparing DMF and FTY.
Methods Patients prescribed DMF (n = 737) and FTY (n = 535) from 2 academic multiple sclerosis (MS) centers (Cleveland Clinic and University of Colorado) were identified. Discontinuation and disease activity endpoints were assessed using propensity score (PS) weighting. Covariates used in the PS model included demographics and clinical and MRI characteristics.
Results PS weighting demonstrated excellent covariate balance. Discontinuation was more common in DMF (44.2%) compared to FTY (34.8%) over 24 months (odds ratio [OR] 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–1.99, p < 0.001). The leading cause for discontinuation was intolerability for both DMF (56.1% of DMF discontinuations) and FTY (46.2% of FTY discontinuations) (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.21–2.25, p = 0.002). The proportion of patients with clinical relapses was low for both medications (DMF, 15.1%; FTY, 13.1%). There was no difference in the proportion of patients with relapses (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.90–1.80, p = 0.174), gadolinium-enhancing lesions (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.92–2.20, p = 0.114), or new T2 lesions on brain MRI (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.83–1.55, p = 0.433).
Conclusions This combined analysis suggests DMF and FTY have similar effectiveness in a large, 2-site clinical population over 24 months. Discontinuation of both DMTs was common and occurred more frequently with DMF, largely driven by intolerability.
- Received February 21, 2018.
- Accepted May 8, 2018.
- Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Related Articles
- No related articles found.