This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective To compare measures of bone mineral density (BMD) between people with and without MS.
Methods Using population-based administrative data from Manitoba, Canada, we identified people with MS who received BMD screening and controls who received BMD screening matched 5:1 on age, sex, region of residence, and date of BMD screening. We determined the BMD T-scores for the femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine and frequency of osteoporosis (defined as T-score −2.5 or lower). We compared the groups with respect to the femoral neck T-score using multivariable linear regression, adjusting for age, sex, region, disability, continuity of care, recent previous fracture, falls history, medication use, and comorbidities. We compared the odds of osteoporosis between groups using multivariable logistic regression analysis.
Results We identified 783 MS cases who underwent BMD screening and 3,915 matched controls. The mean (SD) femoral BMD T-score was lower in MS cases (−1.48 [1.08]) than in matched controls (−1.12 [0.98], p < 0.001), and the prevalence of osteoporosis was higher among the MS cases (range across BMD sites: 16%–26%) vs controls (6%–15%). MS was associated with a lower femoral neck BMD T-score after accounting for covariates (β = −0.24; 95% CI: −0.32 to −0.17) and more than 2-fold increased odds of osteoporosis (covariate-adjusted OR 2.41; 95% CI: 1.82–3.19).
Conclusions People with MS have lower BMD and a higher prevalence of osteoporosis compared with people of similar age and sex without MS. These findings indicate the importance of addressing bone health as part of comprehensive MS care.
Footnotes
Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.
- Received November 18, 2018.
- Accepted February 15, 2019.
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
