This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective The association between patient-reported outcomes and currently used clinical trial endpoints, including total vestibular schwannoma (VS) volume and word recognition score (WRS) in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), is not known.
Methods A prospective observational study enrolling adult patients with NF2 was conducted at a single specialty center. Measures included: NF2 impact on quality of life (NFTI-QOL), short form (SF)-36; total VS volume, WRS; provider- and patient-reported disease severity (ProvSev, PatSev) measured with an institutionally derived multi-item (e.g., symptom burden, age-of-onset, and fatality-risk) and single-item Likert (mild, moderate, severe) scale.
Results Fifty-one patients were enrolled between June 2014 and August 2017. Mean age was 42.1 ± 18.2 years and 37.3% patients were male. Mean WRS was 74.4 ± 37.3%; mean total VS volume was 4.2 ± 5.2 cc. Additional lesions were common including meningioma (79.2%) and spinal ependymoma (39.6%). Mean NFTI-QOL score was 7.6 ± 4.9 and correlated with responses on the SF-36. NFTI-QOL also correlated well with PatSev (r = 0.63, p < 0.001) and both multi- and single-item ProvSev (r = 0.62, p < 0.001; r = 0.52, p < 0.001, respectively). A weak correlation was observed between NFTI-QOL and WRS (r = −0.34, p = 0.0156). There was no correlation with VS volume (r = 0.23, p = 0.15).
Conclusions The NFTI-QOL correlated well with multiple measures of disease severity but not commonly accepted endpoints for NF2 clinical trials including total VS volume in this US cohort of patients with NF2. This suggests that the NFTI-QOL captures components of the patient experience not sufficiently represented by objective measures of disease and underscores the important and complementary role of patient-focused measures in therapeutic outcome assessment in people with NF2.
Footnotes
Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.
- Received October 10, 2018.
- Accepted February 12, 2019.
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence
NOTE: All contributors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.cp.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.
- Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- 200 words maximum.
- 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.