This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background We sought to determine the prevalence of pseudobulbar affect (PBA) in a large MS population and assess its association with disability and symptom severity.
Methods North American Research Committee on MS (NARCOMS) registry participants completed the Center for Neurologic Study-Lability Scale (CNS-LS), a validated 7-question self-report measure of PBA. A composite PBA score was derived from the sum of responses to the 7 questions. We categorized individuals as PBA-positive (PBA[+]) if they had a composite score ≥17 without current depression. Participants also reported their demographic characteristics and their clinical characteristics using Patient-Determined Disease Steps and Performance Scales. We compared clinical and disease characteristics for PBA(+) responders with those without PBA using descriptive statistics and multivariable multinomial logistic regression.
Results Of the 8,136 responders, 574 (7%) had scores ≥17 on the CNS-LS; however, only 200 (2.5%) individuals had scores ≥17 without comorbid depression, of whom only 22 (11%) reported a diagnosis of PBA. PBA(+) individuals tended to be younger (mean [SD] 53.4 [11.0] vs 57.2 [10.3] years), non-white (13% vs 9%), and have lower socioeconomic status (≤$30,000 annual income: 28% vs 22%). In multivariable models, PBA(+) was associated with increased odds of more severe cognitive impairment (moderate vs mild disability OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.84).
Conclusions Our findings suggest that the prevalence of PBA in MS is low, but similar symptoms may co-occur or overlap with depression, highlighting the importance of concomitant assessment of mood when evaluating potential PBA. PBA may be associated with cognitive impairment in people with MS.
Footnotes
Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.
- Received May 8, 2018.
- Accepted July 9, 2018.
- © 2018 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
