Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Translations
    • Topics A-Z
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Translations
    • Topics A-Z
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Practice Current
  • Practice Buzz

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology Clinical Practice
Home
A peer-reviewed clinical neurology journal for the practicing neurologist
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Practice Current
  • Practice Buzz

Share

August 2018; 8 (4) Editorial

Patients are harmed by physician burnout

James L. Bernat, Neil A. Busis
First published June 18, 2018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000483
James L. Bernat
Department of Neurology and Medicine (JLB), Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; and Department of Neurology (NAB), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil A. Busis
Department of Neurology and Medicine (JLB), Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; and Department of Neurology (NAB), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Patients are harmed by physician burnout
James L. Bernat, Neil A. Busis
Neurol Clin Pract Aug 2018, 8 (4) 279-280; DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000483

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
64

Share

  • Article
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

The growing prevalence of physician burnout and its grave harms are now recurring headlines. Among specialists, neurologists have a particularly high risk of burnout.1 In recognition of the seriousness of this problem to American neurology, the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) empaneled a task force to study the problem in all its dimensions, including career satisfaction, work–life balance, and well-being. Their recent reports on the prevalence, causes, consequences, and mitigation of the epidemic of neurologist burnout and the possible strategies to enhance career satisfaction should be studied carefully by all neurologists.2,–,4

Most of the literature on physician burnout addresses the symptoms, causes, and adverse effects of burnout. Burnout is a progressive dysfunctional syndrome comprising emotional and physical exhaustion, depersonalization, extreme cynicism, loss of empathy, career dissatisfaction, a sense of meaninglessness of professional work, and low personal esteem and accomplishment.5,6 Unchecked, it leads physicians to abandon the medical profession and to higher rates of depression, substance abuse, and suicide.5,6

Burned out physicians who remain in the workforce provide suboptimal care for their patients due to their poor judgment, treatment of patients as objects, and increased medical errors, all of which lead to poorer patient outcomes.5 Burned out physicians' lack of empathy exerts a particularly destructive effect on the patient–physician relationship and thereby on patient welfare.7 How can a physician sustain a caring relationship with a patient when the physician no longer cares?

In this issue of Neurology® Clinical Practice, former AAN President Stephen Sergay8 poignantly illustrates how patients have their own form of burnout when treated by burned out physicians. Sergay is a dedicated clinical neurologist devoted to his patients and who is respected and beloved by them. When they tell him during office visits that they detect a problem in their medical care, he knows they are correct. As the American physician–novelist Walker Percy fittingly observed, “If you listen carefully to your patients, they will tell you not only what is wrong with them, but also what is wrong with you.”9

Several factors endemic to contemporary medical practice can damage the patient–physician relationship. The unintended but ubiquitous interference caused by the electronic health record (EHR) has been described in detail10 and quantified in studies.11 Completion of EHR data entry during office visits disturbs the patient–physician relationship by diverting physician eye contact and attention away from the patient. Completion of the EHR outside of the visit markedly adds clerical time to already overburdened physicians, further aggravating work–life imbalance.11 Physicians' awareness that the usurpation of patient visit time by mandated but unproductive EHR documentation compounds their sense that work is meaningless and increases their dissatisfaction with practice. Patients ultimately become harmed as a result.

EHRs were mainly designed for primary care physicians. Successfully practicing neurology depends on a more thorough history and physical examination than many other specialties.5 It is difficult to enter a complete and accurate neurologic history and examination into an EHR and to review electronic records from colleagues. Thus, it is not surprising that neurology is among the specialties with the lowest rate of satisfaction with the characteristics of today's electronic health care environment.11

Current medical insurance reimbursement policies and regulations, intended to compensate clinicians fairly for their work, unintentionally but perversely dictate the content of clinical visits. Led by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, these Evaluation and Management regulations stipulate the elements of history, physical examination, and medical decision-making that clinicians must record to justify an appropriate billing code. As a consequence, medical practices strive to complete these elements regardless of their appropriateness to a clinical situation or their benefit to the patient. The EHR abets this change by providing macros, templates, and other shortcuts that facilitate fulfilling coding documentation requirements. It is no exaggeration to state that these regulations have catalyzed a transformation of American medical practice in which the EHR has become a billing tool rather than a record of a clinical encounter. This perversion of appropriate medical practice to satisfy billing regulations aggravates physician burnout and harms patients.12

A growing cause of burnout that harms patients is the deprofessionalization of medicine, one aspect of which is physicians' loss of control over their medical practices.4,12 In many practice settings, administrative supervisory personnel design daily patient schedules. Administrators lack physicians' Hippocratic obligations to place patients' interests first. To increase patient throughput, they may allot insufficient visit time for neurologists to complete a thorough history, examination, and discussion with the patient. Neurologists' dissatisfaction from taking shortcuts and doing substandard work leads to burnout, and patients suffer when they do not receive proper neurologic care.12 As is true in nearly every instance, factors that aggravate physician burnout also ultimately harm patients.

There are no simple solutions for the problem of burnout because most causes arise from factors outside of the practice of medicine. Experts have proposed and assessed strategies to prevent and mitigate physician burnout.13 Currently, the AAN is implementing programs to disseminate evidence-based resources to members that identify and prevent burnout and strive to increase physician resilience.2 In general, all programs that prevent or mitigate physician burnout also ultimately benefit patients.

One recent physician survey found a correlation between physician burnout and identifying medicine as a calling.14 Physicians who regarded medicine as a lifelong calling that was personally rewarding and served a greater good (as opposed to regarding medicine as a job to earn a paycheck) found more meaning in their work and expressed a greater resilience and tolerance for the frustrations of daily practice. This attitude appeared to prevent the development of burnout. Maintaining the patient-centered ethos of medicine in the face of external pressures presents a continuing challenge but benefits both physicians and their patients.

Author contributions

J. L. Bernat: Drafting/revising the manuscript. N. A. Busis: Drafting/revising the manuscript.

Study funding

No targeted funding reported.

Disclosure

J. Bernat receives publishing royalties from Ethical Issues in Neurology, 3rd ed. (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008) and Ethical and Legal Issues in Neurology: Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 3rd series, volume 118 (Elsevier, 2013); serves/has served on the editorial boards of Neurocritical Care, Neurology Today, The Physician's Index for Ethics and Medicine, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Diseases, and Neurology: Clinical Practice; and has received research support from NIH. N. Busis receives honoraria for speaking at American Academy of Neurology courses and for serving as Alternate CPT Advisor for American Academy of Neurology; and is a former member of the American Academy of Neurology Board of Directors. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.

Footnotes

  • Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.

  • Editorial, Page 346

  • © 2018 American Academy of Neurology

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Sigsbee B,
    2. Bernat JL
    . Physician burnout: a neurologic crisis. Neurology 2014;83:2302–2306.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Busis NA,
    2. Shanafelt TD,
    3. Keran CM, et al
    . Burnout, career satisfaction, and well-being among US neurologists in 2016. Neurology 2017;88:797–808.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Levin KH,
    2. Shanafelt TD,
    3. Keran CM, et al
    . Burnout, career satisfaction, and well-being among US neurology residents and fellows in 2016. Neurology 2017;89:492–501.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Miyasaki JH,
    2. Rheaume C,
    3. Gulya L, et al
    . Qualitative study of burnout, career satisfaction, and well-being among US neurologists in 2016. Neurology 2017;89:1730–1738.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bernat JL
    . How can neurologists avoid burnout? Neurology 2017;88:726–727.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Busis NA
    . To revitalize neurology we need to address physician burnout. Neurology 2014;83:2202–2203.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Melnick ER,
    2. Powsner SM
    . Empathy in the time of burnout. Mayo Clin Proc 2016;91:1678–1679.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Sergay SM
    . The burnout patient. Neurol Clin Pract 2018;8:346–348.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Percy W
    . Love in the Ruins. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux; 1971.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Bernat JL
    . Ethical and quality pitfalls in electronic health records. Neurology 2013;80:1057–1061.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Shanafelt TD,
    2. Dyrbye LN,
    3. Sinsky C, et al
    . Relationship between clerical burden and characteristics of the electronic environment with physician burnout and professional satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc 2016;91:836–848.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Bernat JL
    . Challenges to ethics and professionalism facing the contemporary neurologist. Neurology 2014;83:1285–1293.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Shanafelt TD
    . Addressing physician burnout: the way forward. JAMA 2017;317:901–902.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Jager AJ,
    2. Tutty MA,
    3. Kao AC
    . Association between physician burnout and identification with medicine as a calling. Mayo Clin Proc 2017;92:415–422.
    OpenUrl

The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Author contributions
    • Study funding
    • Disclosure
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Safety in Guillain-Barré Syndrome, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy, and Multifocal Motor Neuropathy

Dr. Jeffrey Allen and Dr. Nicholas Purcell

► Watch

Related Articles

  • The burnout patient

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published

Recommended articles

  • Article
    Burnout, career satisfaction, and well-being among US neurologists in 2016
    Neil A. Busis, Tait D. Shanafelt, Christopher M. Keran et al.
    Neurology, January 25, 2017
  • Article
    Age and sex differences in burnout, career satisfaction, and well-being in US neurologists
    Kathrin LaFaver, Janis M. Miyasaki, Christopher M. Keran et al.
    Neurology, October 10, 2018
  • Views & Reviews
    Physician burnout
    A neurologic crisis
    Bruce Sigsbee, James L. Bernat et al.
    Neurology, November 05, 2014
  • Editorial
    How can neurologists avoid burnout?
    James L. Bernat et al.
    Neurology, January 25, 2017
Neurology: Clinical Practice: 13 (3)

Articles

  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Popular Articles

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology: Clinical Practice |  Print ISSN: 2163-0402
Online ISSN: 2163-0933

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise