This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background: Concern for reactive meningeal enhancement after lumbar puncture (LP) is a common reason for performing brain MRI prior to LP. We sought to determine actual incidence of unexplained meningeal enhancement after LP.
Methods: We collected results from all contrasted brain MRIs in patients admitted to adult neurology at a New York City hospital over a 3-year period. We used electronic medical records to determine whether an LP had been done within 30 days prior to brain MRI. The control group comprised those brain MRIs not preceded by an LP within 30 days prior to imaging. Number of cases of unexplained meningeal enhancement was compared between groups using a Fisher exact test. We recorded variables such as number of LP attempts, needle size, amount of fluid removed, and days from LP to brain MRI.
Results: From 2011 to 2013, there were 77 cases of LP prior to brain MRI and 707 controls (n = 784). Of the cases, 3 had meningeal enhancement, 1 (1.2%) of which was unexplained. Of the 707 controls, 36 had enhancement, and none was unexplained. The p value comparing unexplained enhancement in the cases vs controls was 0.098.
Conclusions: Iatrogenic meningeal enhancement from prior LP that is not attributable to traumatic LP or intracranial hypotension is rare and not more common than in cases without a prior LP. Results suggest that the practice of delaying LP until after brain MRI might not be supported in cases where LP is necessary.
Footnotes
Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.
- Received January 6, 2016.
- Accepted April 4, 2016.
- © 2016 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
