This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Personalized medicine is a new mantra evolving in health care. Harnessing each person’s clinical, genetic, genomic, and environmental information drives the concept. The idea is simple. We can maximize a patient’s chances of a better outcome if we base treatments on what we know. However, isn’t this in many ways the way it’s always been? Isn’t this in part the basis for that old-time house call? To see how a disease or condition is being cared for in the home environment? Clinicians have long used personalized medicine, without overt use of single nucleotide polymorphisms, but certainly not totally void of genetic information. Of course, physicians of the past did not have gene chips, but they did have family histories often informing their decisions. Today as we raise the hopes for targeted therapies to break us free from the algorithmic treatments often followed by hit and miss approaches, there is a renewed fervor for personalized medicine. How do we get there and how does the average clinician or researcher understand the burgeoning array of information, talking heads, and latest hype of subgroup benefits? A key aspect is to trust your training, your experience, and your instincts, coupled with a few repeated doses of biostatistics.
- © 2012 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
