Institutional Evaluation of Fetal Neurology Consults and Postnatal Outcomes
A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Review
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives An increasing number of centers are offering fetal neurology consultation services; however, there is limited information available in overall institutional experiences. Data are lacking on the fetal characteristics, pregnancy course, and the influence of fetal consultation on perinatal outcomes. The aim of this study is to provide insight on the institutional fetal neurology consult process and areas of strengths and weaknesses.
Methods We performed a retrospective electronic chart review of fetal consults from April 2, 2009, to August 8, 2019, at Nationwide Children's Hospital. The objectives were to summarize clinical characteristics, agreement of prenatal and postnatal diagnoses based on best available imaging, and postnatal outcomes.
Results Of the 174 maternal-fetal neurology consults placed, 130 qualified for inclusion based on data available for review. Of the 131 anticipated fetuses, 5 experienced fetal demise, 7 underwent elective termination, and 10 died in the postnatal period. The majority were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit; 34 (31%) required supportive intervention for feeding, breathing, or hydrocephalus, and 10 (8%) experienced seizures during their neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay. Imaging results from 113 babies who had prenatal and postnatal imaging of the brain were analyzed based on the primary diagnosis. The most common malformations were as follows (prenatal % vs postnatal %): midline anomalies (37% vs 29%), posterior fossa abnormalities (26% vs 18%), and ventriculomegaly (14% vs 8%). Additional disorders of neuronal migration were not seen on fetal imaging but were present in 9% of the postnatal studies. Analysis of agreement between prenatal and postnatal diagnostic imaging for the 95 babies who had MRIs at both time points found moderate concordance (Cohen kappa: 0.62, 95% CI 0.5–0.73; percent agreement: 69%, 95% CI 60%–78%). Consult recommendations for neonatal blood tests affected postnatal care in 64 of 73 cases in which the infant survived and data were available.
Discussion Establishing a multidisciplinary fetal clinic can provide timely counseling and create rapport with families to have continuity of care for birth planning and postnatal management. Prognosis based on radiographic prenatal diagnosis requires caution as some neonatal outcomes may vary considerably.
Footnotes
Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Editor Luca Bartolini, MD.
- Received June 17, 2022.
- Accepted October 3, 2022.
- © 2023 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Cutaneous α-Synuclein Signatures in Patients With Multiple System Atrophy and Parkinson Disease
Dr. Rizwan S. Akhtar and Dr. Sarah Brooker
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.