This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives The Charcot-Marie-Tooth Examination Score (CMTES) has been used since 2005 in clinics to measure impairment in patients with CMT and has provided natural history data for patients with CMT1A, CMT1B, CMTX1, CMT2A, and many other subtypes. However, the CMTES requires an in-person visit, and many individuals are unable to travel to CMT centers because of the distance from the clinic or physical disability or more recently because of COVID-19 restrictions. We therefore developed the virtual CMTES (vCMTES) as outlined below. The aim of this study is to create a remote clinical outcome assessment to measure impairment in patients with CMT.
Methods We modified the CMTESv2 replacing the pinprick and vibration items with light touch and position sense, which can be performed remotely by the patient or the patient with an assistant while being observed by the clinic evaluator. Motor evaluations were performed similar to CMTESv2 by the assistant or the patient, while being observed remotely. We developed a standardized protocol to be used with Zoom or a similar format, a training and certification program, and enabled the vCMTES data to be housed in the Inherited Neuropathy Consortium databases. Patients were evaluated in person and remotely for interexaminer and intraexaminer studies.
Results Sixty-four patients with genetically confirmed CMT were evaluated by vCMTES and CMTESv2; 53 patients were evaluated virtually 3 weeks after their initial examination. Ten patients were evaluated with the vCMTES by different examiners 5 days apart. CMTESv2 correlates strongly with the vCMTES in person and virtually (p < 0.0001). There was a strong correlation between the vCMTES made in person and virtually (p < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained comparing symptoms score items, sensory items, and motor items. Interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were ≥0.92.
Discussion Statistical analyses demonstrated that the vCMTES was reproducible and reliable as a clinical outcome assessment for CMT. Further studies are needed to test responsiveness to change and progression in different subtypes. The vCMTES also offers the potential to reach diverse populations that do not have access to CMT centers.
Footnotes
Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Associate Editor Jack W. Tsao, MD, DPhil, FAAN.
- Received April 5, 2022.
- Accepted June 27, 2022.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
