Abstract
Background and Objectives The introduction of spinal muscular dystrophy (SMA)-modifying therapies, such as antisense oligonucleotide therapy, has changed the natural history of SMA. Most reports on treatment outcomes have focused on motor scores and respiratory function. The objective of this study is to document the development and progression of scoliosis in patients with SMA1 treated with nusinersen.
Methods A descriptive single-center study was conducted in patients with SMA1 who were treated with nusinersen before 6 months of age. Data were collected on patients who met criteria, including age at the first nusinersen dose, number of nusinersen doses, degree of scoliosis, respiratory parameters, feeding route, and motor scores at baseline and follow-up. The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP-INTEND) was subanalyzed using axial (AxS) and appendicular motor (ApS) scores to evaluate a possible correlation between scoliosis and axial muscle strength.
Results From our cohort, 31 percent (11/35) of patients had a diagnosis of SMA1. Sixty-three percent (7/11) met the inclusion criteria. All patients (7/7) showed initial improvement in their CHOP-INTEND scores in correlation with improvement on the ApS. Despite this, most patients did not show improvement in the AxS. Subsequently, all patients developed scoliosis in the first year of life with Cobb angles that ranged between 18° and 60°. Furthermore, total CHOP-INTEND scores had dropped in 2 patients alongside the development of a Cobb angle of >40°.
Discussion Despite the significant improvement in functional motor assessment in patients with SMA1, there is a progression of significant scoliosis despite treatment. Subsequently, lack or minimal improvement on the axial CHOP-INTEND scores may predict worsening on the total motor scores.
Footnotes
Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.
The Article Processing Charge was funded by the authors.
Coinvestigators are listed in Appendix 2.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editors were Richard Barbano, MD, PhD, FAAN, and Belinda A. Savage-Edwards, MD.
- Received August 20, 2021.
- Accepted April 11, 2022.
- Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
