Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Translations
    • Topics A-Z
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Translations
    • Topics A-Z
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Practice Current
  • Practice Buzz

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology Clinical Practice
Home
A peer-reviewed clinical neurology journal for the practicing neurologist
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Practice Current
  • Practice Buzz

Share

August 2021; 11 (4) Research

Patient Perceptions of FDA Approval

Gaps in Education or Variation in Values?

View ORCID ProfilePaul J. Ford, Robert J. Fox, Mary Beth Mercer, Stacey S. Cofield
First published January 25, 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001034
Paul J. Ford
Neuroethics Program (PJF), Cleveland Clinic; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis (RJF), Cleveland Clinic; Department of Bioethics (MBM), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Department of Biostatistics (SSC), The University of Alabama at Birmingham.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paul J. Ford
Robert J. Fox
Neuroethics Program (PJF), Cleveland Clinic; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis (RJF), Cleveland Clinic; Department of Bioethics (MBM), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Department of Biostatistics (SSC), The University of Alabama at Birmingham.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Beth Mercer
Neuroethics Program (PJF), Cleveland Clinic; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis (RJF), Cleveland Clinic; Department of Bioethics (MBM), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Department of Biostatistics (SSC), The University of Alabama at Birmingham.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stacey S. Cofield
Neuroethics Program (PJF), Cleveland Clinic; Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis (RJF), Cleveland Clinic; Department of Bioethics (MBM), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Department of Biostatistics (SSC), The University of Alabama at Birmingham.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Patient Perceptions of FDA Approval
Gaps in Education or Variation in Values?
Paul J. Ford, Robert J. Fox, Mary Beth Mercer, Stacey S. Cofield
Neurol Clin Pract Aug 2021, 11 (4) 273-279; DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001034

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
69

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Abstract

Objective To assess perceptions and opinions about the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval process for disease-modifying therapies (DMT) in people living with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods People living with MS were invited to complete a web-based survey of their perceptions of the FDA role and process for approval of MS medications. The survey asked about the role of the FDA, factors involved in the approval process, which voices should represent those with MS in deliberations about drug approval, and the level of comfort with uncertain safety of newly approved therapies.

Results Three thousand thirty-three respondents met inclusion criteria for data analysis. Most respondents seemed to understand the role of the FDA, although only half understood a fundamental FDA role: balancing the risks and benefits when considering drug approval. Significant differences were observed in many areas between those who have and have not tried DMTs. Comfort with uncertainty was associated with several factors relating to side effects and benefits believed important for the FDA to consider. Most respondents reported that people who participated in the medication's clinical trial were particularly able to represent people living with MS.

Conclusion Perceptions regarding the FDA and views of who should represent people living with MS varied between those who have and have not tried DMT. There is variability in personal values that should be recognized and taken into account when considering regulatory responsibilities. Interventions are needed to address educational gaps regarding the mission and trustworthiness of the FDA as an oversight body.

Footnotes

  • Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.

  • Received June 2, 2020.
  • Accepted October 30, 2020.
  • © 2021 American Academy of Neurology
View Full Text

AAN Members

We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.

Google Safari Microsoft Edge Firefox

Click here to login

AAN Non-Member Subscribers

Click here to login

Purchase access

For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)

Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here 

Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page.  Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00.  Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means.  The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use.  Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.

The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Study Funding
    • Disclosure
    • Appendix Authors
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Use of Whole-Genome Sequencing for Mitochondrial Disease Diagnosis

Dr. Robert Pitceathly and Dr. William Macken

► Watch

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • All Ethics in Neurology/Legal issues
  • Advocacy
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Legislative affairs

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published

Recommended articles

  • Article
    A survey of risk tolerance to multiple sclerosis therapies
    Robert J. Fox, Carol Cosenza, Lauren Cripps et al.
    Neurology, March 13, 2019
  • Editorial
    US health insurance is an obstacle to disease-modifying treatments in MS
    Dennis Bourdette, Francesco Patti et al.
    Neurology, June 29, 2016
  • Research
    Identifying priority outcomes that influence selection of disease-modifying therapies in MS
    Gregory S. Day, Alexander Rae-Grant, Melissa J. Armstrong et al.
    Neurology: Clinical Practice, April 23, 2018
  • Research
    Perspectives on marijuana use and effectiveness
    A survey of NARCOMS participants
    Stacey S. Cofield, Amber Salter, Tuula Tyry et al.
    Neurology: Clinical Practice, August 01, 2017
Neurology: Clinical Practice: 13 (2)

Articles

  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Popular Articles

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology: Clinical Practice |  Print ISSN: 2163-0402
Online ISSN: 2163-0933

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise