This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective Hemidecortication is a therapeutic option in patients with drug-resistant structural epilepsy. If surgery is performed early enough in left-hemispheric pathology, the plasticity of the developing brain may enable the right hemisphere to take over language—if this has not occurred before surgery. A systematic overview of potential predictors of language outcome after left hemidecortication in children is warranted.
Methods In a systematic literature review, we analyzed 58 studies on language lateralization after congenital or postneonatally acquired left-hemispheric pathology, and on language outcome after left-sided hemidisconnection, such as hemispherotomy. Single-subject data were pooled to determine the distribution of lateralization across etiologies in congenital lesions and across age groups in acute postneonatal lesions. A hierarchical linear regression assessed the influence of age at surgery, lesion type, age at seizure onset, and presurgery language function on language outcome after left hemidecortication.
Results In acute postneonatal lesions, younger age at injury was significantly associated with right-sided language lateralization (Cramér V = 0.458; p = 0.039). In patients with hemidecortication, age at surgery was not significantly associated with language outcome (Cramér V = −0.056; p = 0.584). Presurgical language function was the most powerful predictor for postsurgical language outcome (F4,47 = 7.35, p < 0.0001), with good presurgical language bearing the risk of postsurgical deterioration. In congenital pathology, right-sided language lateralization was most frequent in pre-/perinatal stroke (Cramér V = 0.357; p < 0.0001).
Conclusions We propose a presurgical decision algorithm with age, presurgical language function, language lateralization, and left-hemispheric structural pathology as decision points regarding surgery.
Footnotes
Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.
- Received August 12, 2019.
- Accepted February 28, 2020.
- © 2020 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.