This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background Recovery from Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) may be protracted, and patients may need prolonged ventilatory support. We present clinical data from a tertiary referral weaning center managing patients with GBS requiring prolonged ventilatory support.
Methods A retrospective review of patients managed in a 34-bed specialist ventilator weaning facility in London, United Kingdom, between 2006 and 2017. Data including demographics, initial presentation, and ventilatory support were collected. Functional recovery and outcome data were collected between 12 months and 3 years following disease onset.
Results Twenty-nine patients with severe GBS requiring prolonged ventilation were included. In several patients, coexisting conditions or complications affected the course. Seventy-six percent (n = 22) were successfully weaned from invasive ventilation with a median time to tracheostomy decannulation of 193 days (range: 49–527 days). Use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV), as part of the weaning program, was applied in 59% (13/22), with 14% (3/22) requiring long-term nocturnal NIV. Twenty-four percent (7/29) were not decannulated, with 14% (4/29) supported on long-term invasive ventilation. Forty-five percent (10/22) weaned from invasive ventilation were able to achieve short distance–assisted ambulation. Mortality at 36 months was 17% (5/29), with 3 of these deaths occurring in patients invasively ventilated during their acute admission.
Conclusions GBS with severe respiratory muscle weakness and bulbar dysfunction may require prolonged invasive ventilation. However, there is potential for complete weaning from invasive mechanical ventilatory support with associated function recovery. These data highlight the importance of maintaining ongoing support and rehabilitation for patients with GBS requiring prolonged ventilation.
Footnotes
Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.
- Received July 7, 2019.
- Accepted October 28, 2019.
- © 2020 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.