This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective To define the prevalence and characteristics of spinal cord transient ischemic attack (sTIA) in a large retrospective series of patients who met diagnostic criteria for spontaneous spinal cord infarction (SCI).
Methods An institution-based search tool was used to identify patients evaluated at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, from 1997 to 2017 with spontaneous SCI (n = 133). Cases were subsequently reviewed for transient myelopathic symptoms preceding infarction that were suspected ischemic in nature. We performed a descriptive analysis of patients with sTIA before SCI.
Results Of 133 patients with a diagnosis of spontaneous SCI, we identified 4 patients (3%) who experienced sTIA before SCI. The median age at presentation was 61.5 years (range 46–75 years), 2 (50%) were women, and 3 (75%) had traditional vascular risk factors. Localization was cervical cord in 2 cases (50%) and thoracic cord in 2 cases (50%); all patients developed SCI in the same distribution as their preceding sTIA symptoms. All patients experienced recurrent sTIA before SCI. Symptoms ranged from seconds to a few minutes before returning to baseline. No patients had pain as a feature of sTIA.
Conclusions sTIAs are possible but rare in patients who subsequently have a SCI. Clinical features are similar to those of SCI, with rapid onset of severe myelopathic deficits, followed by prompt resolution. Vascular risk factors are common in these patients. Thus, recognition of a sTIA may represent a valuable opportunity for vascular risk factor modification and stroke prevention. However, given the rarity, physicians should explore other possible explanations when sTIA is considered.
Footnotes
Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.
Editorial, page 469
- Received June 17, 2019.
- Accepted October 3, 2019.
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.