This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background Approximately 400,000 diagnostic lumbar punctures (LPs) are performed by neurologists yearly in the United States. There has been a transition from neurologists performing >40% of LPs 2 decades ago to now <15% of the time. High body mass index (BMI) is one of the key obstacles of LP for neurology residents, and the success rates drop to 58% when BMI is >35 kg/m2.
Methods A prospective intervention study was conducted from March 2017 to March 2018 at an academic medical center. Patients were divided into ultrasound-guided LP or conventional LP. The primary outcome was the success rate of LP. The secondary outcome was the parameters regarding LP performance, the patients' feedback after procedures, and the residents' feedback about the learning modules.
Results Eighty-two patients were enrolled with inclusion criteria of age >18 years, BMI ≥25 kg/m2, and able to give written informed consent. The ultrasound-guided LP group showed higher success rate (92.7% vs 68.3%, p < 0.05) and less duration of time (17.02 vs 37.63 minutes, p < 0.05) compared with the conventional LP group. It also showed advantages of decreased trials of needle insertions and redirections and reduced pain levels perceived by patients.
Conclusions This study suggests that using ultrasound to localize before LP could increase the LP success rate and improve other related LP outcomes in the overweight populations. Our study also provides evidence that brief, targeted teaching modules are feasible and effective for ultrasound-guided LP training.
Classification of evidence This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 undergoing LP, ultrasound guidance increases the LP success rate.
Footnotes
Dr. Ade is now with Dartmouth University, Hanover, NH.
Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
- Received March 31, 2019.
- Accepted August 2, 2019.
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
