This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective To describe the experience of obtaining a diagnosis of frontotemporal degeneration (FTD) for patients and caregivers.
Methods Data came from a 2017 web-based survey of 698 FTD caregivers. Clinical characteristics and diagnostic experiences were described according to the phenotype of the patient with FTD (behavioral variant FTD, primary progressive aphasia, FTD with motor neuron disease, or progressive supranuclear palsy/corticobasal syndrome). Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses determined associations between patient with FTD and caregiver characteristics and (1) receiving a diagnosis >1 year after initial symptoms and (2) first receiving a non-FTD diagnosis.
Results Mean age was 66 ± 9 years for patients with FTD and 61 ± 10 years for FTD caregivers. Forty-four percent of patients took more than 1 year; 65% saw 3 or more doctors; and 84% required 3 or more visits to establish an FTD diagnosis. Initial diagnosis was depression or other psychiatric condition in 21% of patients. Twenty-eight percent of caregivers and 26% of patients lost ≥11 work days seeking diagnosis. The majority of diagnoses (66%) were made by neurologists. Patient and caregiver age, having a spouse caregiver, rural residency, and mood changes as first symptom were associated with a longer time to receive FTD diagnosis. Caregivers frequently rated diagnosing doctors as good/excellent in knowledge of FTD but as inadequate/poor on knowledge of available community resources.
Conclusions This study, which quantifies the patient with FTD and caregiver burden before receiving the FTD diagnosis, can inform clinical practice, interventions to address diagnostic delays, and programs and services to support patients/caregivers during and following the diagnosis.
Footnotes
Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp.
- Received June 3, 2019.
- Accepted July 22, 2019.
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
The Nerve!: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.